Showing posts with label LEvidence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label LEvidence. Show all posts

Thursday, 18 March 2021

COL meeting #2: 18th March, 2021

COL#2: 18th March, 2021


Today we had our second COL meeting at Pt England Primary school.  It was lovely to see the team for the first time in person this year.  Below are some of the notes I took from my meeting. 


Think about a size that is manageable and measurable.

What causes our kids to have a reading problem.  Not enough vocab?  So what?  What's the inquiry?

Teacher feedback or impact makes the most impact on a student.

Has to be something that we are in charge of.



How would we hone down things like engagement?



Kotahitanga - Dr Russell Bishop said 'kids do well if they get on with the teacher'.


“Something in the deliberate acts of teaching that could make a big difference”. Teachers might be doing it the wrong way or not doing it enough.


How do you know whose getting what and the right amount?  

We can measure the lunch programme - if they get the same stuff, how come boys are lower.

Control groups not always fair. Not compulsory.


Agree around some commonality but see the difference

Collaborative Inquiry is a “can do”

A group could agree to use a common tool 

They may end up using a different approach or could combine and try the same approach (may be a benefit in more numbers)

Still needs to be based on the evidence from various classes i.e. variations in content in response to learners.


In order to develop an intervention it’s important to know why is that happening?


Discussion time - find others who are doing similar inquiries.


https://christinetupou.blogspot.com/

https://potofaalili.blogspot.com/


I had an awesome discussions with Poto and Christine and how they want to focus on empowering the learners through the teachers that teach them.

Key takeouts:

  • We share the fact that our Pasifika kids respond to their Pasifika teachers better
  • Identity is a key factor that allows our learners to feel valued.

I had always felt that sometimes my inquiry is too focused on the how what I could do would change literacy and numeracy when the reality is, what needs addressing is teacher practice.  My passion is our empowering our Pasifika learners and after talking to Poto and Christine, I feel committed to continue my line of inquiry.




Inquiry Question #2: Inquiry Focus

Inquiry Question2 : From what you know already about your classes and your school’s profile and leadership goals for the year, share a possible inquiry focus.


My initial inquiry draft#2 is:

How does taking teachers on a journey of growth in Tapasā affect their pedagogical implementation?


Our school is made up of at least 68% Pasifika students.  We have strategies that we think we know and use around how to be culturally responsive to the needs of our students but there hasn't really been an inquiry to show how we can better adapt best evidence practice when engaging our Pasifika learners.


Part way through 2020, after reading a document containing student voice from our school, I decided that I wanted to turn that voice into action.  From this has came the Tamaki College Pasifika Initiative.  There are multiple levels of the initiative and one key aspect has been to implement the Tapasā into our teaching and learning.


I have been thinking about how to support those staff who are not Pasifika in implementing the Tapasā.  In saying that, there is an assumption that Pasifika teachers know how to teach Pasifika kids and although this may be true, relying on Pasifika staff to 'deal' with our Pasifika students.  So I'm am broadly thinking about who I would want to work with.


My inquiries in the past have focussed on a class and how I would implement interventions to accelerate achievement.  And these have usually been positive.  From my experience, I have noticed that as a Pasifika teacher myself, the students can relate to my teaching style and therefore respond positively.  I feel I am 'good' at teaching Pasifika students and therefore doing another inquiry whereby I teach the students I am inquirying into isn't condusive to the bigger picture.  We know that students engage with people who look like them and can connect with them.  My wonderings are: how can staff who don't look like me (ie. Pasifika) teach kids who look like me (ie. Pasifika).


I feel as a HOD and a passionate advocate of Pasifika education at Tamaki College, I would like to support non-Pasifika staff to connect with our Pasifika students better using the well documented and value added strategies shared in the Tapasā.  


My style of teacher support is to understand my teachers underlying assumptions and beliefs and to collaborate on a ‘framework’ that will allow them to look at their perceptions of our Pasifika students differently and build a repertoire of skills to support the learners in front of them.


Although our specific blogpost is supposed to frame our focus as a desired change in student learning and NOT a change in teaching, I am still working out how supporting our teachers will enhance and/or accelerate student learning and whether this needs to be a focus.


Initial Plan


My initial Planning will be to:

  • Invite staff to join my inquiry
  • Share with them the purpose of my inquiry and how it could support them
  • Make a plan to regularly catch up with them
  • Capture learnings through voice recordings and/or video observations.
  • Pick out and align learnings from the Tapasā. 
  • Document carefully our meetings
  • Look at the different models that we could apply such as the growth mindset and the iceberg model.
  • Identify trends and patterns from our meetings and share with my team.


Wednesday, 17 March 2021

Inquiry Question #1: Collaborate

My task was to collaborate with my school's leadership team and colleagues to identify areas where my inquiry will make a powerful contribution to the wider school and cluster goals.


Goal number 4 of our school goals for 2021 is: 

All teachers at Tamaki College will be well supported so that their practice meets the needs of their students. 


We have aligned our department goals to this school goal:


By the end of the year, we will have developed relatable practical teaching and learning resources to support the varying teaching needs of our team to meet the learning needs of the students in our Social Science classrooms.  There is a focus on our Maori and Pasifika learners.  We will construct a Social Sciences framework with which we will apply the learnings from the Standards for Profession teaching using the Tapasā as a lense, to enable all Social Sciences teachers  to have a kete/bank of strategies to support our learners across each year level.


My draft #1 Inquiry focus that I discussed with my school’s leadership team and colleagues was:

Can I develop the capabilities of my staff to accelerate learning through understanding and applying the Tapasā in a year 10 Social Studies class?


At this stage, ‘develop the capabilities’ relates to:

  • Me understanding in depth the Tapasā
  • Understanding where my team are and know about culturally responsive pedagogy
  • Understanding where my team are and know about the Tapasā
  • Wondering if kids can learn in an environment where the strategies from the Tapasā is prevalent and at the forefront of the teaching and learning/

Specific Outcomes:

  • A ‘collaborative framework’ for staff in my department to develop with my guidance and support
  • A ‘framework’ for success in collaboration with students
  • A positive shift in achievement data related to PAT or asttle writing (possibility)

Wider school goals: 

  • School goal:  Focus on school goal #4, on teacher wellbeing


Cluster wide goals: 

  • Manaiakalani Achievement Challenges
  • Challenges identified by Woolf Fisher at our cluster wide meeting specifically reading 


Through formal and informal discussions, I have talked to the following people:


My school’s leadership team: 

  • Our School Principal (Senior Leadership team).  
    • It is an inquiry that is paramount and embedded in your practice
    • This is part of core business and will help staff develop cultural awareness 
    • It will be useful to the growth of the department meaning that it will shift achievement in some way.
    • You won’t be reinventing the wheel and should not be more work then what you are currently doing.
  • Heads of Department (related to curriculum).
    • How can what you learn apply to other subject areas.
    • Positive in the way it can support our students.

Colleagues:  

  • HOD in another department
    • The more strategies the better especially around managing behaviour.
    • It would be good to support staff in having restorative and meaningful conversations
  • Teachers in my department
    • How much more work is required?
    • Can it work in my classroom? Strategies and tasks that you can see works.
    • We would like support in how to scaffold collaborative groups because we don’t do it enough.
  • Teachers from other curriculum areas
    • I can see the value in working across curriculum areas.  How would assessments and reporting on the class look?
    • Sharing ‘knowing the learner’ in a consistent centralised place important


Professional Colleague with Language and Inquiry Experience:  Dr Jannie Van Hees

  • This is in two parts and maybe too big to do.  For the meantime, don’t worry about affecting learning and achievement as yet. 
  • Uptake of the journey to somehow be evident in the pedagogy and then we make a projection (after analysing blogging, logging, student voice and discussions) to see what are some trends.
  • Think about how you can collect evidence and measure this. 
  • I think It will be interesting to see how they (not giving them do this do that) but saying from that piece of learning, I might try this and I might try that, alright go for it.  With regular checkpoints, the support will be there.


After discussing with the SLT and a number of colleagues and experts my draft#1 inquiry, I have decided to reframe my inquiry to focus on the capabilities of members of my department.  My Draft#2 of my Inquiry is along the lines of: 


How does taking teachers on a journey of growth in Tapasā affect their pedagogical implementation?. 


I will attempt to discuss this further in my next blog.




Saturday, 20 June 2020

9AK #7: Evidence gathering: Connecting with whanau during lockdown

Did connecting with whanau support student learning during the lockdown?  

The lockdown was a chance to connect with whanau on a another level.  Before the lockdown, students were sent to school for their learning and that was that.  During lockdown, students pretty much brought their homes, lives and families to ‘school’ with them when they were forced to shared their learning spaces with their teachers.  I was interested in how our students handled this and I found an article that talks about the vā, the relative space between people and their relationships.

“The vā that binds: a Pasifika education story during Covid-19” describes the vā as a sacred space that online learning interrupted.  Teachers were invited into the sacred spaces of our kids in their homes.  In that space, the divide grew wider or got closer, depending on whether the kids trusted you or not.  At the start of the lockdown, my seniors were all for it turning up to online classes religiously.  But nearer the end, they were rarely there.  There would be a few reasons for this.  Much of the school work they were doing was individualised research which required basic checking in and quick discussions and they were off.  Another reason for a lack of attendance was that many students either worked, babysat or were expected to contribute to the household chores and rarely had time to login(see a recent blog post).  

The juniors on the other hand were there everyday, ready to learn.   In the 9AK project based class, I had at least 75% attendance on average from my year 9's and it was really enjoyable connecting with them in this way.  Most of the time, they had their screens off and mute buttons on. 

I'd like to highlight one student who regularly invited me into his whanau ’space' whenever our classes were on.  Below are the interactions we had from the lockdown (I have changed the boys name to Adam).

Week 1:  Adam introduced his little brother to the class and was feeding him whilst taking part in the lesson. 

Week 2:  Adam’s mum joined the class kahoot with us and beat Adam in a couple of the questions.

Week 3:  Mum helped Adam brainstorm capabilities when he was stuck (see video 11 mins - 11.45 secs).

The week before we went into level 1, Adam’s mum had described to me online her worries about sending her son to school.  I reassured her that she didn't need to send him to school until she was ready and he wouldn't miss anything as we were still online as well as in the classroom.   She seemed happy with my response.

Now that we are pretty back to normal teaching and learning in the classroom, I feel that I have a better relationship with Adam compared to before the lockdown.  If he gets distracted during the lesson, I just call out his name and give him the 'look' and he apologies and refocusses.  I feel there is an unspoken respect and trust that has been formed as a result of connecting with his mum during lockdown.  

The fact that these small connections occurred closes the gaps with the vā.  My wonderings are that if we can shorten the va’, how do we continue the momentum?  I am excited to learn more about developing better connections with our whanau to support our student learning.

Wednesday, 18 March 2020

Discussions around my inquiry with an expert #1

Today I had the opportunity to sit down with Jannie Van Hees, our literacy expert to sound out my inquiry as I was feeling a little anxious about how to approach it.
Below is the dialogue that I had with Jannie.

Is it o.k that my inquiry is something I didn’t know about at the beginning and to say that?
  • Novel/ Pioneer/ Original 
  • No intervention
  • It's o.k to say that I didn’t know what I was going to do until I did it.
Where can this my inquiry fit in the big picture with regards to the follow?
  • Talanoa 
  • Key competencies
How should I identify my group I want to do?  
Depends on the goals.  How pedantic should choosing the group be
  • Choices:
    • One that I have a relationship with
    • One that I have no relationship with 
    • Neutral
  • Observations about the Water safety crew- individually (hows it going as a group) PMI
    • Floundering away with the lack of knowledge
    • They have a high level of compliance
    • Not challenging - keep it confidential for now
    • Hows it going as a group? What are the pluses? Minus?
Should I also look at how teachers collaborate to plan the course or should I just stick to the students?
You should be kind to yourself.   It's about managability’. You could look at collaboration as teachers and how they adjust.  Talk individually to the teachers.

In what ways can I collect data?
Video one focus group.
Look for the idea chain:
  • One dominates idea chain
  • Two quick to say oh yea thats good
  • When someone grabs an idea and goes yes  but doesnt look at other possibilities
  • Leave it with the group.
  • Teach talanoa
  • Video the group, let them look at the footage.  2 points that you are doing well and 2 not so well.
  • I want to meet with the kids fortnightly
  • Look at the footage and says what stands out?
  • Format:  What are 2 stand outs going well.  What are questionable?
Put it into a shared space to see if the kids get a chance to review themselves.
You are learning to enhance your own learning capabilities through working with others who have a like mind and that more minds are better then mine.

Whats the trends across the group?  Whats the trends that I see?  What are the implications for you?

Then throw in the Talanoa.
Want the kids to experience learning in a collaborative way about something that matters to them.  
My intention is to see the journey and to discern from that new learning that will enable me to replicated.

If countries have the virus in Taiwan is low deaths (masks - bus full of tourists, compliment), Italy high deaths - high percentage of other people (slapping, hugging, kissing - don’t tell me what to do).  We think we are our own person but we are very cultured.
We came together as a group of teachers to do something different here because we needed to.  I asked myself ‘will this work for what we say is the needed journey for these kids if we want to make a significant change for the way we deliver learning 

Does project based collaborative ways of learning in a Talanoa environment, is this the persuasive difference maker for the learning journey’s of our kids.  

This would be typically how year 9’s do it.  This is how we’ve delivered learning in the past.  What were some of the issues arising.  This was the causality of why we needed.  But again, just because we are going to make a change, doesn’t mean it’s going to totally work. 

Genuine inquiry into a real situation of the unknown. 

Friday, 1 March 2019

Introducing my inquiry group for 2019

The group that I am building my inquiry around are my year 9 social studies class.  There 21 students in the class,  8 female and 11 males.  There are 6 Maori students, 5 female and 1 male.

I want to look at their reading scores from 2018, to see how they scored before they arrived to Tamaki.  Then I can think about ways to address the learning abilities of the students in the class.


I have included a breakdown in ethnicity as I am exploring cultural visibility and responsive practice and it is good to know what ethnic groups my kids below to.  I am hoping to build learning profiles of my students through individual meetings once their 2019 easttle writing and PAT reading results are available.  We will set goals and develop a plan of learning for the year.  Hopefully this will kick start their thinking into success in social studies this year. 

Thursday, 28 February 2019

Should we teach kids about the neurons in their brain so they can learn?

In discussions with Dr Jannie Van Hees around ways to use language learning effectively, a key idea she has discussed is the need to put the 'lense on language' so that our learners can achieve success.  An example of how we did this was the lesson we recently had with our year 9's who were learning about concepts in migration.  When Jannie drew a brain on the board and explained that making yourself learn these concepts helps the neurons in your brain move and become active, I felt that the kids felt more connected to their learning.  She reminded them that unless you use your brain, it will be inactive.  In the lesson, students were 'forced' to use their brains and re-energise them to ensure that the learning wasn't just 'surface' level but ingrained in the brains to allow for access when needed.  Following on from the lesson with Jannie, I decided I wanted to find out more about how the neurons worked in the brain and whether teaching something like this to our kids could help them be more engaged in their learning and improve outcomes.


The search for answers
I began like all good researchers do, I googled 're energise brain neurons education NZ'.  The first link was to the TKI ESOL site which gave specific examples of metacognitive (thinking about thinking) strategies and how teachers could scaffold learning using different templates and strategies. The title of the page was 'Thinking and metacognition' and although it didn't help me explain if teaching kids about their brains would be a good thing, I am locking this link away for later for when I need a few teaching strategies.

The second link was better.  It was a blog by a writer and educationalist called Dr Donna Wilson.  She has written a lot of books and publications.  She is an expert in the field. Her blurb read like this:
For more than two decades, Dr. Donna Wilson has been a pioneer in bridging brain science and psychology to educational practice. She co-developed the world’s first MS /EdS degrees in Brain-Based Teaching and Instructional Leadership (BrainSMART), as well as the first Doctoral Minor in Brain-Based Leadership. Dr. Wilson has co-authored 20 books and over 100 articles, book chapters, and blog postings.

The particular link that I'd clicked on was a blog post by Dr Wilson called 'Building a Metacognitive Classroom' Featured in New Zealand magazine' which shared a piece that she had co-written for our very own New Zealand 'Teaching matters' magazine.  I went to article itself and as I read it, I was excited to find out that teaching kids about their brain has a positive impact on engagement and achievement in school.  A Secondary school example of how a teacher in Georgia taught 'neuroplasticity' showed that 'emphasing that our brains can change and that we're always getting smarter as long as we are learning' was a proven strategy that worked.

Another article by Dr Donna Wilson and Marcus Conyers called 'The boss of my brain' explains how 'explicit instruction in metacognition put students in charge of their learning'.  It goes on to talk about how lessons about neuroplasticity (how learning new information and skills changes the structure and functioning of the brain) are especially inspiring for struggling students, who may have internalised the idea that they cannot become academically successful'.  How cool would it be for our kids to know that if they used their brains 'more', they could redirect their learning and essentially achieve their best in their learning?

When looking for New Zealand specific examples of this type of learning, I came across a publication by an ex-principal in Rotorua, Eden Chapman, who was awarded a scholarship in 2016 to examine how our education system was applying Neuroplasticity in our schools and if this was effective.  He found that the few schools who did use strategies to address this, had to essentially buy expensive programmes to run them with specific learners.  It seems that my search had come to a bit of a dead-end.  Why weren't we teaching this more in our schools?

Reflections:
In synthesising what I have learnt in my search for answers so far, I found that kids need to know and understand how their brains work and this needs to be explicitly taught and continually reinforced for our kids, especially our struggling learners.  In my own teaching practice, I know I have become too complacent and don't push my kids enough to make them really use their brains to work.  When I think back to the lesson that Jannie and I taught recently, when we made the kids really learn the concepts using multiple opportunities to learn, this forced them to energise those 'neurons' and what grew out of this learning were kids who 'got it'.  My hunch is, that if kids are reminded that learning re-energises their brain, not their friends brains, but their own brains, they will feel empowered and motivated to learn and this will lead to positive outcomes.

Next steps:
I will continue to discuss with Dr Jannie ways to explicit teach how the brain works for the year 9's perhaps in our next unit, which will be a collaboration with the English department.  I also want to survey the students to see if learning about the brain is important to them and to see if they can make   a connection between knowing how their brains work and improved outcomes in social studies.


Wednesday, 27 February 2019

Team-teaching with Dr Jannie Van Hees #1: 'Languaging' social studies through re-energising the brain

Today we had our lesson with my year 9 social studies class.  Jannie and I have been looking at ways to address the challenge that our kids have had with understanding and applying key concepts in the context of migration.  For this lesson, we wanted to engage the kids through slowing down the language with active learning and discussions.

The lesson:  
We started by getting the class to re-energise their brains.  This was a term that Jannie suggested would help kids to kick-start their brains and to force them to use them.  After a slow start (ie kids were shy) Jannie took a slight detour and talked about how in our brains we have lots of neurons and if we don't use those neutrons and think and force our brains to make connections using the neurons, our brains will slow down and as the saying goes, 'if you don't use it, you lose it' (I noticed the kids were engaged when they were shown this, and I wonder, if the kids knew how their brains worked, would they feel more empowered to use them to learn and apply stuff?  I'm going to do a bit of research around this).


In our planning meeting, Jannie and I agreed that we would focus on teaching the concepts and how to develop students understanding of the concepts through case studied examples.  In reality, we spent the whole double period learning and remembering what the words were and what they meant.  We used lots of different ways to engage with the concepts - individual recalling, pairs, groups, modelling, students challenging each other to remember etc.  (I filmed some of the lesson below so that I could reflect on the techniques and the lesson itself).


Reflections:
As the lesson progressed and students grew more confident in their knowledge of the concepts, I could see how slowing the learning of the language helped them feel safe and empowered in their use of the terms.  By the end of the lesson, students were standing up to share what they'd learnt and I was pleased to see this, especially from the kids who were usually the quiet ones!

For me personally I found it hard to spend so much time on learning and knowing the concepts and I was not used to taking it so painstakingly slow.  I am used to telling the kids what the words are, having them learn the definitions, then apply them to an example, then move on.  Parts of the lesson had me anxious.  On reflection, I could see that I was driven by the pressures of time - that little voice was saying 'hurry up, we need to move on to the next bit, hurry up because we won't finish everything, hurry up we're moving too slow'!.  After seeing what happened during the lesson for our kids, I have to rethink my thinking and learn to remember the 'why' around slowing the learning.  I shared my experience with a critical friend who understood my frustrations but helped me see that it is better off to pause and slow down the learning when they're younger and we can afford to this in year 9. "When you unpack the language now, then you can get back to the agenda and the kids will fly".

What next: 
Big Picture: I have to think about the overall big picture and how to plan around lessons like this where we 'slow the learning'.  What do we need to make sure we cover in our social studies curriculum?  Which achievement objectives do we have to meet and how much time do we have to meet them?   Are there things that we are teaching now, that we don't have to teach, and take out to accommodate for this new learning?  How can I measure whether this will work or not?

Applying these concepts consistently:  Over the next few lessons, I want to see if the students can remember the concepts and apply them to different contexts.   I want to find a way measure whether spending more time on the learning and knowing of these concepts will help them engage better with their learning and hopefully help them achieve success in improving their literacy skills.

Saturday, 23 February 2019

Understanding the inquiring teacher: CoL teachers meeting #1

I was fortunate enough to meet with Fiona, our Manaiakalani facilitor who talked me through our first CoL meeting for 2019 that I had missed. Here are some of my notes:

We talked about the inquiring teacher and how there were 3 styles of teaching approaches.

In Dr Graeme Aitken's background paper "The inquiring teacher: Clarifying the concept ofteaching effectiveness" (2007) he discusses the 3 views of effective teaching:
  • The 'style' view
  • The 'outcomes' approach 
  • The 'inquiry' approach
(My thoughts are that I can see both the 'style' view (ie that we think teachers effectiveness should be the focus) and the 'outcomes' approach (ie the data reflects the effectiveness of the teacher) currently working within our school system. The focus is on what the teacher does and whether kids get results).
The Inquiry model: “Since any teaching strategy works differently in different contexts for different students, effective pedagogy requires that teachers inquire into the impact of their teaching on their students.” (NZC, p.35).

There are two phases to the inquiry model: Inquiry 1 looks at knowing what is happening for the students in my classroom and inquiry 2 asks questions that explore teacher actions and that lead to student learning.

The cycle of inquiry establishes the process of inquiry one and two. It enhances the opportunity to learn for the teacher (learning about the impact of my own practice) and for the students (changed teacher practices aimed at increasing students engagement and success).

The approach to teaching effectiveness requires particular knowledge and skills and attitudes:

Knowledge and skills

  • Pose questions that capture the main dimensions between teaching and learning
  • Collect valid and reliable information
  • Analyse data to identify patterns and issues (Aitken, 2007)

Attitudes
a. Advancing knowledge implies "a genuine willingness to re-search one's own teaching - to open it to ordered and intentional analysis and critique".
b. Ideas from all sources. Testing my beliefs, not just to reaffirm them.
c. Fallibility: No absolute truths, our hypothesis may fail but keep searching.

I need to have an understanding that our ideas and beliefs might be wrong but that's o.k. We are inquirying into the impact of our teaching on our students.

My Wonderings: What does IMPACT mean? What does it mean to different people?


All inquiry cycles are intended to:
  • Be centred on a particular group of learners in your care in your context
  • Seeing the words 'in your care' has triggered interesting thoughts.
  • What does 'in your care' mean?
There are 8 attributes of an inquiring teacher: Efficacy, high expectations, curiosity, clarity, noticing, collegiality, criticality and resilience.

My thinkings out loud:
When I think about the challenges of student learning that I've come across, I have a few. One is when I ask the kids to argue why an issue is an issue, they research why other people think it's an issue. Dialogic conversation could lead to conceptual critical thinking leading to 'The Talanoa'. (The spoken word 'Brown Brother'). "We Pasifika people, are an oral people. We tell our stories through our voice, our music, our dance and yet you try and define us through reading and writing?" This is a persistent idea that gnaws away at me and I need to figure out how to word it better.

Back to understanding inquiry, when collecting data we need to look at:
  1. Achievement (reading, writing, maths relative to national norms)
  2. Rates of progress: Term 1 2018 to Term 4 2019.
  3. Achievement and knowledge of achievement
  4. Beliefs
  5. Community and family voice
  6. Systematic teacher observations of student engagement
Key takeouts:

  • Don't try and think of solutions yet
  • Think Globally
  • Make the main thing, the MAIN THING.


COL Inquiry #6C: Academic Reading "Teaching to the North East"

From the Secondary Teacher Literacy Handbook page 33:  Bishop (2019) stated that to improve Māori achievement, teachers need to  create an e...